I was a little disappointed with the special effects in Transporter 2 until I realized: Hey, Jason Statham is putting on some of the best fight scenes I've ever watched. What the hell do I care?
Besides, I'm all for positive representations of men with high hairlines. Although I'm sure the suit and the Audi A8 also help.
And never will.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(301)
-
▼
January
(31)
- Talk of the weather will do.
- Power of the press.
- Record breaking.
- "This run has the highest probability of producing...
- Seven weeks out, or, Why I'll be dead by spring br...
- The surly bonds of Earth.
- On not freezing my bollocks off in an Alaskan winter.
- Extinction.
- "I think we show up at his house two years from no...
- Finally, somebody at K-State is useful for something.
- As if curling didn't have enough problems already.
- Mmm, beer.
- Visionary.
- On bumming around in sweats and not leaving the ap...
- Housekeeping.
- Nothing more useless than a bulletproof vest that ...
- Is it something in the water?
- Shot in the arm.
- Heart.
- Wait, what?
- Jason Statham is the greatest badass in the histor...
- White paper.
- I am frightened by whoever photoshopped this.
- Can you feel it?
- Snark.
- #*&@!
- Cause the FCC can suck it, that's why.
- Host with the most.
- Fight On.
- Resolved.
- Chart topper.
-
▼
January
(31)
2 comments:
Dude, it was an Audi W12 (fuckin' aye!) and that movie was laughable at how unbelievable it was (and I mean that in the least flattering way possible). Still, Jason Statham... badass.
- Works
The car itself was an A8 with a W12 engine. And as to the laughability of the film: indeed. The special effects were just horrendous. The car, the fight scenes and the lack of love interest were all improvements on the first movie, but still, there's only so many barrel rolls a Gulfstream can do in mid-air before making a head-on collision into the water where it proceeds to *not* destruct into a million pieces.
Post a Comment