And never will.
05 March 2006
Things I Love, #56.
The sweet, soft 'oohh' that Deb Talen inserts in the chorus of 'Painting by Chagall' by the Weepies. I bought this album last night, and had to tear myself away from the computer so I would go take pictures at Mo Rocca's 'Gamekillers', before ending up at a bonfire with Mischa. But this album was playing in my head the entire time; I am a sucker for cascading tonal changes within words, and the Weepies bring that in spades.
28 February 2006
On my first college road trip ever, and it just happens to be Pancake Day.
Pretty freakin' sweet, considering that I spent 13 hours in a car for 11 waking hours in Liberal, KS. Jeff, Annie, Tim, and I all headed west for the grand festivities of this Shrove Tuesday. We left at noon yesterday, and spent the night at Jeff's parents' house (they happen to be super nice, by the way; they will receive the Church of Beer's highest order, just as soon as we, uh, think it up) where I realized that I am, indeed, a cookie addict (to go with my other status as a brownie whore). This morning, we dined on pancakes that really had quite a bit of soaking power, and watched as another KU grad student, Henry, gave a speech as England's official representative to Liberal for the day. Then we headed downtown to watch the series of pancake races held under sunny skies and in perfect temperatures (perfect, we believed, for what could be world record times). At noon the feature event, the international women's race, ended with the front-runner tripping 20 feet from the line, and the winning time in Liberal was five seconds slower than the time recorded in Olney, England, six hours previous, thus snapping Liberal's seven-year winning streak. Fortunately, this did not dampen our barbeque lovin's, and we then piled back into the car for the 6.5h trip back to Lawrence. A fantastic time with my best friends and some good food and the international brotherhood of running with breakfast pastries.
On a completely unrelated note, I wanted to amend my column that ran in today's Kansan; in my submitted version, the following paragraph goes in right after 'And, please, for the love of Tonya Harding, stop taking it all so damn seriously.' The editors are perfectly in their right to cut down as they see fit (they also made stylistic changes that I in no way take responsibility for, as always), but this passage makes a larger point that I wanted to discuss in addition to the others presented.
And on another completely unrelated note, I am less than two weeks from the end of my yearbook career. I not only have to design 70 pages in the next twelve days, but likely come up with most of the pictures for said pages. In other words, I will be dead by 13 March. That, or I'll have an I.V. pumping maple syrup straight into my veins.
On a completely unrelated note, I wanted to amend my column that ran in today's Kansan; in my submitted version, the following paragraph goes in right after 'And, please, for the love of Tonya Harding, stop taking it all so damn seriously.' The editors are perfectly in their right to cut down as they see fit (they also made stylistic changes that I in no way take responsibility for, as always), but this passage makes a larger point that I wanted to discuss in addition to the others presented.
Lindsey Jacobellis fell in the final seconds of her snowboardcross final. She had a sizable lead on her Swiss opponent, and coming off the next to last jump, she pulled a method air, went off-balance and nearly wiped out before recovering to her feet and finishing with a silver medal. Her actions were treated with unimaginable disdain; to the journalists watching, she should have gone straight and narrow down that course, won her gold medal and waved her flag while giving a Wheaties smile. That she is still one of the top snowboarders on the planet doesn’t matter; that she and her fellow extreme athletes operate by a less, shall we say, stringent notion of athletic behavior is seemingly forgotten in the media. It’s not surprising, though, as it was forgotten by our society long ago.
And on another completely unrelated note, I am less than two weeks from the end of my yearbook career. I not only have to design 70 pages in the next twelve days, but likely come up with most of the pictures for said pages. In other words, I will be dead by 13 March. That, or I'll have an I.V. pumping maple syrup straight into my veins.
26 February 2006
I can stop watching TV and have my life back!
[Compliments to Jeff for the title of this post.] Yes, my grand, unprecedented Olympic viewing experience is now complete. There are many, many things I could say about the Torino Games, but for right now I'd like to cap it with these few thoughts:
In such a magnificent stadium and setting, on such a special night...Ricky fucking Martin?
I have a serious crush on Mary Carillo.
I don't even want to know how many athletes have already gotten laid over there tonight.
I did go buy the Bode Miller autobiography. This is like when I finally started rooting for Howard Dean just as all of his momentum evaporated. Yes, a lot like that, but not really.
Bob Costas is getting on my nerves more often than usual.
And my videotape for the last day of competition and the ceremonies ended at literally the very second that the traditional closing montage on NBC ended. If that's not a sign, I don't know what is. Buona notte, all.
In such a magnificent stadium and setting, on such a special night...Ricky fucking Martin?
I have a serious crush on Mary Carillo.
I don't even want to know how many athletes have already gotten laid over there tonight.
I did go buy the Bode Miller autobiography. This is like when I finally started rooting for Howard Dean just as all of his momentum evaporated. Yes, a lot like that, but not really.
Bob Costas is getting on my nerves more often than usual.
And my videotape for the last day of competition and the ceremonies ended at literally the very second that the traditional closing montage on NBC ended. If that's not a sign, I don't know what is. Buona notte, all.
Ryan's TV time.
Updated daily to reflect the number of hours I have spent watching NBC's Olympic coverage since the Opening Ceremonies on the night of 10 February 2006: 106h
10 Feb: 4h
11 Feb: 7.5h
12 Feb: 7h (I'll have to wait until next weekend to go for the eight hour barrier)
13 Feb: 4.5h
14 Feb: 4.5h
15 Feb: 5h (Includes some Olympic late-night and the Today Show's Matt & Al going down a luge run while screaming like little girls)
16 Feb: 5.5h (An extra half-hour in primetime, plus some Olympic late-night on tape)
17 Feb: 5h (Lost a half-hour due to the greatest car battery replacement *ever*)
18 Feb: 11h (Admittedly, about five hours of this is on videotape to be watched tomorrow during the Daytona 500, when I should be studying)
19 Feb: 6h
20 Feb: 8.5h (Thanks presidents!)
21 Feb: 4.5h
22 Feb: 4.5h (Can I break one hundred?!)
23 Feb: 5h
24 Feb: 7.5h (Finally watched some of the Olympic late-nights that I had on tape)
25 Feb: 10h (I did it!! The Closing Ceremonies will truly be the icing on the cake)
26 Feb: 6h
10 Feb: 4h
11 Feb: 7.5h
12 Feb: 7h (I'll have to wait until next weekend to go for the eight hour barrier)
13 Feb: 4.5h
14 Feb: 4.5h
15 Feb: 5h (Includes some Olympic late-night and the Today Show's Matt & Al going down a luge run while screaming like little girls)
16 Feb: 5.5h (An extra half-hour in primetime, plus some Olympic late-night on tape)
17 Feb: 5h (Lost a half-hour due to the greatest car battery replacement *ever*)
18 Feb: 11h (Admittedly, about five hours of this is on videotape to be watched tomorrow during the Daytona 500, when I should be studying)
19 Feb: 6h
20 Feb: 8.5h (Thanks presidents!)
21 Feb: 4.5h
22 Feb: 4.5h (Can I break one hundred?!)
23 Feb: 5h
24 Feb: 7.5h (Finally watched some of the Olympic late-nights that I had on tape)
25 Feb: 10h (I did it!! The Closing Ceremonies will truly be the icing on the cake)
26 Feb: 6h
23 February 2006
Goosebumps.
It's amazing that as much figure skating as I've watched in the last thirteen days, I just can't seem to get into the ladies. All of the talk about the new scoring system detracting from the artistic elements has finally caught up to me I guess. While watching the pairs and the ice dancing I thought it was great that the system was now demanding athleticism to be brought in to the routines, but we expect something different from the women as they skate alone. We want grace, and we get endless spinning crotch shots. We want them to float, not speedskate. We want art and power, and the times we get both seem to be few and far between anymore.
Perhaps I spoiled myself when I accidently broke cardinal rule #1 and clicked on ESPN.com this afternoon and was a touch too slow to raise my hand to the screen. Perhaps I further inflamed it when I went to NBColympics.com and clicked up the video of Sarah Hughes' free skate in 2002. But I'm not sorry for the latter; it was perhaps the most sublime performance I have seen in eight Olympics, and I'm not ashamed to admit that I choked up a good number of times while rewatching it. In every Olympics I have what I like to call the 'goosebumps test': who makes me absolutely unable to sleep that night after watching them. Sarah aced that one four years ago, a rising performance that just took your breath away with each element.
Tonight, there was sadly none of that (though of all the Olympians this time around, Irina was most certainly my most favorite to watch). I wish a gold medal could always be won in the strength of a competition, and not merely by default. With this new system yes we get plenty of jumps, but we don't get our goosebumps. Athletics and aesthetics, when done right, should be inseparable. When done right, they should make us jump.
Perhaps I spoiled myself when I accidently broke cardinal rule #1 and clicked on ESPN.com this afternoon and was a touch too slow to raise my hand to the screen. Perhaps I further inflamed it when I went to NBColympics.com and clicked up the video of Sarah Hughes' free skate in 2002. But I'm not sorry for the latter; it was perhaps the most sublime performance I have seen in eight Olympics, and I'm not ashamed to admit that I choked up a good number of times while rewatching it. In every Olympics I have what I like to call the 'goosebumps test': who makes me absolutely unable to sleep that night after watching them. Sarah aced that one four years ago, a rising performance that just took your breath away with each element.
Tonight, there was sadly none of that (though of all the Olympians this time around, Irina was most certainly my most favorite to watch). I wish a gold medal could always be won in the strength of a competition, and not merely by default. With this new system yes we get plenty of jumps, but we don't get our goosebumps. Athletics and aesthetics, when done right, should be inseparable. When done right, they should make us jump.
19 February 2006
Forza Italia.
I would apologize for the lack of posts about anything other the Olympics this past week, but I could give a damn. Not since Atlanta in '96 have I had this much fun watching an Olympics. Throughout the 60 hours so far that I've devoted myself to, I've been picking up on all sorts of little things about each sport: skidding in the bobsled, tucking in the downhill, lifting on the ski jump. Indeed the big surprise for me has been my newfound fascination with figure skating; tonight's ice dancing performances have made me repent for all the laughs I ever gave to comedians who made fun of this event.
And after yesterday's superb documentary on the 'Great Race', the 4x10km men's cross-country relay in Lillehammer '94 in which Italy upset the heavily-favored Norwegians on home-snow, I was even more excited about the fourth installment of that famed rivalry. Ultimately, one of these years the race would have to be a blow-out, and this time it was Italy coming in first, a minute and fifteen seconds in front of Norway; regardless of margin of victory, the party was on in Torino and Italy, and it seems to have simply poured fuel onto the fire to carry these games through this last week of competition. Exams, yearbook, and Pancake Day notwithstanding, I'll carry on as well.
And after yesterday's superb documentary on the 'Great Race', the 4x10km men's cross-country relay in Lillehammer '94 in which Italy upset the heavily-favored Norwegians on home-snow, I was even more excited about the fourth installment of that famed rivalry. Ultimately, one of these years the race would have to be a blow-out, and this time it was Italy coming in first, a minute and fifteen seconds in front of Norway; regardless of margin of victory, the party was on in Torino and Italy, and it seems to have simply poured fuel onto the fire to carry these games through this last week of competition. Exams, yearbook, and Pancake Day notwithstanding, I'll carry on as well.
15 February 2006
Nothing short about 5K.
If I knew how to skate, I would take up short-track speedskating in a heartbeat so that I can take part in the 5000m relay. That looks like the most fun sporting event *ever*. And that includes anything that the Swedes ever came up with.
(The joke there being that they like doing things naked. Like volleyball and go-cart racing.)
(The joke there being that they like doing things naked. Like volleyball and go-cart racing.)
13 February 2006
You can keep your basketball.
And your football, and your baseball, and your what the hell ever. I just watched the most amazing display of athletic courage and fortitude in my life. Zhang Dan bashes her knees on the ice, hits the boards, and still manages to skate well enough to win a silver medal, but I'm sure that was the last thing on their minds during the remaining four minutes of their free skate. They attempted what had never been done (and I mean never; Inoue and Baldwin hit a throw triple axel before they came to the Olympics, so they were just here for the record), chose to complete what they stepped onto the ice to do, and I'll be damned if I wasn't a babbling idiot by the end. God I love this stuff.
ETA: A commenter in the TWoP 2006 Winter Games forum (no, my TV time doesn't reflect all of the time I spend on Olympic related materiel each day, which is sad in itself) said "How incredible is it that all 3 medal-winning pairs have had major injury within the past year and a half, 2 of them on ice? That speaks to the toughness of these athletes." Indeed.
ETA: A commenter in the TWoP 2006 Winter Games forum (no, my TV time doesn't reflect all of the time I spend on Olympic related materiel each day, which is sad in itself) said "How incredible is it that all 3 medal-winning pairs have had major injury within the past year and a half, 2 of them on ice? That speaks to the toughness of these athletes." Indeed.
Sequins.
I am finding myself absolutely transfixed by the pairs figure skating right now. I've watched figure skating since Albertville in 1992, but I guess I never really looked at the athleticism required to do some of the things these guys and girls are able to do on a sheet of ice with quarter-inch wide steel blades on their boots. I'm not saying that I'll be just as devoted to ice dancing, but for tonight they've got a convert.
And to prove the point, I totally forgot about this.
And to prove the point, I totally forgot about this.
11 February 2006
Commercialization.
I am very much in love with the ExxonMobil commercial of the kids walking, bouncing, and otherwise making the movements of winter olympians, because I very much did that myself when I was in third grade and first realized just what the Olympics were. I especially remember speed skating down the hallways at school...and everywhere else we went, I suppose.
Meanwhile, Chick-Fil-A is on my shitlist until the end of time. Their new spot in which a cow holds up a line of bulldozers trying to build a new burger joint is about the most dispicable commercial I've ever seen. Using one of the most powerful images and symbols of freedom in history–the man standing in front the tanks at Tiananmen Square–is and should be beyond the pale for any profitable use, especially for second-rate chicken sandwiches (and no, not even your waffle fries can save you this time).
Meanwhile, Chick-Fil-A is on my shitlist until the end of time. Their new spot in which a cow holds up a line of bulldozers trying to build a new burger joint is about the most dispicable commercial I've ever seen. Using one of the most powerful images and symbols of freedom in history–the man standing in front the tanks at Tiananmen Square–is and should be beyond the pale for any profitable use, especially for second-rate chicken sandwiches (and no, not even your waffle fries can save you this time).
10 February 2006
Of all the times I wish I had HDTV.
I'm not quite sure it was the best opening ceremony I've ever seen, but it was definitely the most beautiful. Stadio Olimpico looked absolutely stunning from every which way; the dove and the ski jumper were about the most original artistic portions I've ever seen in an OC; Pavarotti deserved to be in the largest opera house ever; and the lighting of the cauldron was neat and imaginative (if solely because the only other way to light it would've been by helicopter). The disco music during the parade of the athletes was definitely inspired, though it ranks behind Athens bringing in DJ Tiƫsto for a live house rave. And if there are more women over there who look like Carla Bruni, then Fabrica or no Fabrica, I'm making my way to Italy when I'm all said and done here in Lawrence.
Now for the minuses: STFU Brian Williams. You damn near ruined my seventh opening ceremony; if you're around for an eighth, I will cut you. NBC has a habit of splicing out lots of stuff to make room for the seven million hours of face time they have to give to Kwan, Bode, Chad, and Tomato Guy; they edited the hell out of Athens in 2004. And last but not least, somebody give Bob Costas an enema. Man's gone downhill since Barcelona in '92; maybe he's still suffering Dick Enberg withdrawals.
Now for the minuses: STFU Brian Williams. You damn near ruined my seventh opening ceremony; if you're around for an eighth, I will cut you. NBC has a habit of splicing out lots of stuff to make room for the seven million hours of face time they have to give to Kwan, Bode, Chad, and Tomato Guy; they edited the hell out of Athens in 2004. And last but not least, somebody give Bob Costas an enema. Man's gone downhill since Barcelona in '92; maybe he's still suffering Dick Enberg withdrawals.
XX.
Fettuccine with organic spaghetti sauce: check. Two packs of blank videocasettes: yep. Couch and TV in optimal viewing angle: you got it.
My mom was saying earlier today how neat it is that I still get as excited for the Olympics as when I was a kid. To which I say, indeed. Let the Games begin.
My mom was saying earlier today how neat it is that I still get as excited for the Olympics as when I was a kid. To which I say, indeed. Let the Games begin.
09 February 2006
On reviewing a movie when he should be sleeping.
So I realize I'm a little late with this, but Cidade de Deus (City of God) might be about the most amazing feature film I've ever seen. It didn't take my breath away like Diarios de motocicleta (The Motorcycle Diaries), but I set that standard pretty high when I walked out of Liberty Hall, turned to Tom, and said 'That's the greatest movie I'll ever watch.' Greatest, most amazing: there's a fine line there, even if only I can see it.
City of God was just flawless in its execution, in every way including the innovative flashbacks to tell the story (normally they can bog down, but the piecing together was fabulous). The acting, the cinematography, even the typography (nerd!) used for the chapter headings were all inspired. Well done indeed.
Alright, now it's off to bed. Almost fourteen hours until the opening ceremonies start in Torino! (Nineteen hours until the broadcast; damn NBC.) If you need me, you can find me in 17 days.
City of God was just flawless in its execution, in every way including the innovative flashbacks to tell the story (normally they can bog down, but the piecing together was fabulous). The acting, the cinematography, even the typography (nerd!) used for the chapter headings were all inspired. Well done indeed.
Alright, now it's off to bed. Almost fourteen hours until the opening ceremonies start in Torino! (Nineteen hours until the broadcast; damn NBC.) If you need me, you can find me in 17 days.
07 February 2006
Record breaking, Pt. 2.
And as if the TV wasn't bad enough, I'm addicted to a computer game too. Nikefootball.com has this game called Upgrade where you pilot a vehicle that is shaped like a soccer boot through obstacles to score as many goals in a minute as you can, while also picking up time and point bonuses. I routinely place in the daily top ten, mostly in the top three, and I've been keeping track of my own records. A week ago my personal best was 31 goals and 4276p., which I thought to be damn good until I had the game of my life last night with 34 goals and a whopping 5222p., including 1600p. each for levels 2-4. Tonight, I couldn't play for shit, and only had 31 goals for 4506p. That's the problem with stellar, MVP performances; they weigh down on you every time you take the field of battle afterwards.
Goddammit, I'm serious about this.
Goddammit, I'm serious about this.
05 February 2006
On reading the very first issue of 'Play', the Times' new glossy sports magazine.
SI and ESPN should be thanking God that this is only a quarterly.
Cause the NFL can suck it, that's why.
I chose not to go somewhere to watch the Super Bowl this year, because I didn't want to be lambasted by the commercials and the pre-game and the pre-pre-game and the halftime show and everything that helps hide the fact that there is, in fact, a football game being played. I was hoping to listen to said game on the radio, but the NFL in its infinite wisdom has apprarently given the radio broadcast rights to Sirius and Westwood One; I don't have the former, and the latter has no stations near Lawrence. So congratulations to the National Football League: I'm going to spend this evening reading and listening to podcasts about anything other than football. Well, at least your kind of football.
01 February 2006
"Bill made a funny. Hee!"
I used to think the biggest loss I suffered when I shut off my cable was 'The Daily Show.' Lately, though, I'm thinking it might be 'The Countdown' on MSNBC. Watch Olbermann destroy O'Reilly. And then watch it again, simply because you can't stop yourself.
31 January 2006
Talk of the weather will do.
On this, the last day of January, I counted five people on campus wearing shorts, three of them sans jacket or long-sleeves. For all of the talk about 'Oh how nice it is!', I'm cringing and bracing myself for the other shoe that must–must!–inevitably drop. Where last year it snowed briefly during spring break, I'm expecting this year nothing less than three inches of ice. Or perhaps a typhoon.
Power of the press.
So I had this cute little post all ready for the publication of my first column for the Kansan. The title was going to be Let the hate mail begin! and then the post would just be 'They're sooo gonna start hucking rocks at me on campus today' with a link to the column on Kansan.com. However they're not posting today's opinion stuff (and *just* the opinion stuff). So I can't.
But that doesn't mean there's not still the possibility that I'll be forced to run a gauntlet through Frasier Hall; the worst thing would be to get pricked by those 'This is what a feminist looks like' buttons. I hate shots.
But that doesn't mean there's not still the possibility that I'll be forced to run a gauntlet through Frasier Hall; the worst thing would be to get pricked by those 'This is what a feminist looks like' buttons. I hate shots.
30 January 2006
"This run has the highest probability of producing a lawsuit."
Now this is how one does a scientific study: double-diamond ski runs, moguls, and alcohol. What could possibly the fuck go wrong?
27 January 2006
Seven weeks out, or, Why I'll be dead by spring break.
For the first time since I took over the Jayhawker, I will miss a deadline. It upsets me and makes me feel like I've failed, which as my advisor David said today, "at least shows that [you're] not a sociopath." Including this deadline, I have 108 pages, including four full-color pages that are due within five days of the Jayhawks NCAA tournament end. At the way our team is currently standing, I'll probably go ahead and have those pages done with the rest of the book by 13 March.
Course this gets a little more involved due to the lack of interest shown by most of my photography staff. I have a couple of people who are still contributing, but for the most part, I haven't fulfilled my duties in really managing my staff. So I'm taking it upon myself to carry this book home; instead of planning things around my classes (which don't count anymore anyways), I'm planning around photo opportunities. Last night was an concert by our a capella group, tonight was a swim meet and Chinese New Year's dinner, tomorrow is a track meet and Mozart tribute concert. I also woke up at 5:15am this morning and decided that since the Rec was opening in 15min., I might as well go ahead and get a work out done. And now it's 6:40pm and I'm supposed to meet Jeff, Annie and Tim for dinner downtown and I'm exhausted.
At this rate, I'll be a wired, emaciated former yearbook editor by St. Patrick's Day. But dammit, I'll have a portfolio to send to Italy. Visions of pasta are the only thing getting me through this anymore.
Course this gets a little more involved due to the lack of interest shown by most of my photography staff. I have a couple of people who are still contributing, but for the most part, I haven't fulfilled my duties in really managing my staff. So I'm taking it upon myself to carry this book home; instead of planning things around my classes (which don't count anymore anyways), I'm planning around photo opportunities. Last night was an concert by our a capella group, tonight was a swim meet and Chinese New Year's dinner, tomorrow is a track meet and Mozart tribute concert. I also woke up at 5:15am this morning and decided that since the Rec was opening in 15min., I might as well go ahead and get a work out done. And now it's 6:40pm and I'm supposed to meet Jeff, Annie and Tim for dinner downtown and I'm exhausted.
At this rate, I'll be a wired, emaciated former yearbook editor by St. Patrick's Day. But dammit, I'll have a portfolio to send to Italy. Visions of pasta are the only thing getting me through this anymore.
The surly bonds of Earth.
I can't believe it's been twenty years since the Challenger exploded. I vaguely remember that day; we were living in Rifle, Colorado at the time, and I wasn't yet in school so I was home that day to watch the lift-off (being full-on in my astronaut phase, as all four year olds have to be). The only thing I really remember about the disaster, though, is my mom calling my dad at his radiator shop to tell him what happened. Eighteen years later, my mom would do the same to call me from New York when the Columbia disappeared off radar, to break apart in the skies over Texas.
Anyway, NASA has put up a tribute site on their Day of Remembrance. Take a look, and take a moment.
Anyway, NASA has put up a tribute site on their Day of Remembrance. Take a look, and take a moment.
26 January 2006
Extinction.
Because, obviously, one futuristic sci-fi action movie featuring a pretty girl as a trained assassin capable of taking on entire armies in a fight for mankind while canning the most crappy one-liners of dialogue ever ... wasn't enough. Anybody who thinks the traditional Hollywood studio/creative structure needs protection should be forced to watch those movies with their eyelids taped open.
Granted, however, this is not the worst punishment imaginable. That would be watching Michael Douglas or Tim Robbins trying to exude any notion that they might still be capable of having sex.
Granted, however, this is not the worst punishment imaginable. That would be watching Michael Douglas or Tim Robbins trying to exude any notion that they might still be capable of having sex.
24 January 2006
"I think we show up at his house two years from now naked with a box of cigars and go, 'You know what, stick them wherever you want, just come back.'"
Jon Stewart, in June 2001, on Bill Clinton. What I wouldn't give for us to go back to the days when getting one's winky wacked was the worst thing one could do in the Oval Office.
23 January 2006
Finally, somebody at K-State is useful for something.
Course, the president will likely still get away with playing with truthiness, but good on ya' Tiffany Cooper.
As if curling didn't have enough problems already.
Continuing with our series on just what the hell is going on up in Scandinavia, the Swedish women's curling team joins up with a heavy-metal band for 'Hearts on Fire.'
I know what you're thinking, and no, it's a different 'Hearts on Fire.'
I know what you're thinking, and no, it's a different 'Hearts on Fire.'
21 January 2006
20 January 2006
On bumming around in sweats and not leaving the apartment all day.
Not like I don't have a good reason. Canada, sorry but I'm gonna have say 'no.'
Housekeeping.
When I came back from a week in Humboldt, I actually weighed in at 148 lbs, which is a bit over my prediction. However, thanks to my new resolution and figuring out a good schedule for going to the Rec, I was able to shave a good four pounds off that in the three weeks since coming back. Plus, as pertains to Resolution #1, I ran 5K on the treadmill Wednesday with a (rather unnecessary) quarter mile walk break at the halfway point; I may be able to run 10K by the end of February, and spring break at the latest. My new resolution is now to break my personal best of 48'50" at 10K by June.
For R#2, I have decided to set aside my grad school plans and pursue some alternatives, namely the Columbia Publishing Course at the famed Journalism School in New York City. It is a summer program, and being as I won't know my status for sure until March or April, I have had to decline working for Duke TIP again this summer (which sucks, because I was very much looking forward to being around Mischa and Lee and Julie and any other returning staffers again). In addition to that Course, I am also hoping to get accepted into Fabrica, Benetton's communication studies institute about 40km outside of Venice, Italy. If I get through the trial period (which in itself would be two weeks in Italy; score!), then I sign a contract for a year-long internship to work on publishing projects and such.
On R#3, last night was indeed 80's Night, or Neon as they prefer to call it, at the Granada. I went with Mischa and Michelle; being a little rusty from months of no dancing, I was pleased with my groove by the end of the night. However, if I were to get on a treadmill and force myself to run 10K while wearing kevlar body armor, I would not have been as sore as I was while walking out of the Granada. I forgot how much twisting one tends to do when one listens to classic Madonna.
This being my last semester at KU then, I'm excited. I only have two classes, on Tuesday and Thursday afternoons from 1-4pm, and I'm way excited about them (if for no other reason than because it's the lowest amount of money I've ever spent on textbooks). The first is from my dear mentor, Prof. Bob Antonio, on Sociology and the Economy; this will be my third class with him, the two others being the two best classes I've ever taken in college. I'm sure he can handle the expectations. The other course is History of Photography, my first ever art history course; I really don't have anything else to say about it, but I hope that changes.
The yearbook is, um, well, hm, going. We have a deadline of 40 pages that I have to send off a week from today, and at this moment in time I only have about a dozen pictures of the campus buried in snow. Which is cool, but there's not even any sledding, and I am *all* about sledding photos. Nevertheless, I'm sure Joah and I will pull it off; we're like Harvey Birdman and Peanut. I'll leave you to determine which one is which. (Hint: I'd be the one more likely to say 'Oooh, sprechen sie sexy...')
On that note, I watched two and a half hours of Harvey Birdman DVDs this week. Best written show on television AND it has Stephen Colbert.
In addition to the yearbook, I am also serving as a regular columnist for the University Daily Kansan this semester. My column starts on Tuesday, 31 Jan., and will run every two weeks after that (meaning that I get the Valentine's Day column. Ha ha! Chocolate fueled depression). My parameters are roughly anything within the realm of politics and economics, so I'll be writing on, among other things, the politics of Roe v. Wade (hmm, I wonder where I'll go with that...) and the economics of organic farming. And if I get more hate mail from the Young Democrats than from the College Republicans, well that's just icing on the cake.
I've also applied for the position of Commissioner of Elections for this spring. The elections for Student Body president/VP and for the Student Senate are held every April, and they need a non-partisan student who is interested in politics and the law to administer the elections and investigate campaign code violations. It should work with my schedule well (I'll be done with the yearbook by spring break), and I looove the title of Commissioner Scarrow. *chills*
And finally, this is really something that only I could pull off: I managed, over the course of the past seven months, to forget my mom's, my dad's, and my sister's birthdays. In case you're new to the show, that's my entire family. I've already invoked the 'freebie' rule to cover this past year, and have sworn a blood oath that it will never happen again. Until I forget my blood oath. Because it has happened before.
For R#2, I have decided to set aside my grad school plans and pursue some alternatives, namely the Columbia Publishing Course at the famed Journalism School in New York City. It is a summer program, and being as I won't know my status for sure until March or April, I have had to decline working for Duke TIP again this summer (which sucks, because I was very much looking forward to being around Mischa and Lee and Julie and any other returning staffers again). In addition to that Course, I am also hoping to get accepted into Fabrica, Benetton's communication studies institute about 40km outside of Venice, Italy. If I get through the trial period (which in itself would be two weeks in Italy; score!), then I sign a contract for a year-long internship to work on publishing projects and such.
On R#3, last night was indeed 80's Night, or Neon as they prefer to call it, at the Granada. I went with Mischa and Michelle; being a little rusty from months of no dancing, I was pleased with my groove by the end of the night. However, if I were to get on a treadmill and force myself to run 10K while wearing kevlar body armor, I would not have been as sore as I was while walking out of the Granada. I forgot how much twisting one tends to do when one listens to classic Madonna.
This being my last semester at KU then, I'm excited. I only have two classes, on Tuesday and Thursday afternoons from 1-4pm, and I'm way excited about them (if for no other reason than because it's the lowest amount of money I've ever spent on textbooks). The first is from my dear mentor, Prof. Bob Antonio, on Sociology and the Economy; this will be my third class with him, the two others being the two best classes I've ever taken in college. I'm sure he can handle the expectations. The other course is History of Photography, my first ever art history course; I really don't have anything else to say about it, but I hope that changes.
The yearbook is, um, well, hm, going. We have a deadline of 40 pages that I have to send off a week from today, and at this moment in time I only have about a dozen pictures of the campus buried in snow. Which is cool, but there's not even any sledding, and I am *all* about sledding photos. Nevertheless, I'm sure Joah and I will pull it off; we're like Harvey Birdman and Peanut. I'll leave you to determine which one is which. (Hint: I'd be the one more likely to say 'Oooh, sprechen sie sexy...')
On that note, I watched two and a half hours of Harvey Birdman DVDs this week. Best written show on television AND it has Stephen Colbert.
In addition to the yearbook, I am also serving as a regular columnist for the University Daily Kansan this semester. My column starts on Tuesday, 31 Jan., and will run every two weeks after that (meaning that I get the Valentine's Day column. Ha ha! Chocolate fueled depression). My parameters are roughly anything within the realm of politics and economics, so I'll be writing on, among other things, the politics of Roe v. Wade (hmm, I wonder where I'll go with that...) and the economics of organic farming. And if I get more hate mail from the Young Democrats than from the College Republicans, well that's just icing on the cake.
I've also applied for the position of Commissioner of Elections for this spring. The elections for Student Body president/VP and for the Student Senate are held every April, and they need a non-partisan student who is interested in politics and the law to administer the elections and investigate campaign code violations. It should work with my schedule well (I'll be done with the yearbook by spring break), and I looove the title of Commissioner Scarrow. *chills*
And finally, this is really something that only I could pull off: I managed, over the course of the past seven months, to forget my mom's, my dad's, and my sister's birthdays. In case you're new to the show, that's my entire family. I've already invoked the 'freebie' rule to cover this past year, and have sworn a blood oath that it will never happen again. Until I forget my blood oath. Because it has happened before.
18 January 2006
Nothing more useless than a bulletproof vest that can't, you know, stop a bullet.
And they say that bloggers aren't 'true' journalists. My ass.
17 January 2006
Is it something in the water?
I don't know what goes on in Iceland, but if I can have kids as gorgeous as these, I might just move there. And you know, their music scene doesn't seem to be all that bad either.
14 January 2006
Shot in the arm.
The times when I read an essay that floors me in both its analysis and foresight with regards to current geopolitical realities seem to be fewer and farther between anymore. Prepare to be floored.
12 January 2006
Heart.
I was explaing to my mom the other night what it meant to *heart* something. For example, I *heart* this keyboard.
No no, you don't understand. I *heart* it. Badly. With a devotion so strong and solid that it is unknown to but a few other people on this planet.
No no, you don't understand. I *heart* it. Badly. With a devotion so strong and solid that it is unknown to but a few other people on this planet.
11 January 2006
Jason Statham is the greatest badass in the history of badassery.
I was a little disappointed with the special effects in Transporter 2 until I realized: Hey, Jason Statham is putting on some of the best fight scenes I've ever watched. What the hell do I care?
Besides, I'm all for positive representations of men with high hairlines. Although I'm sure the suit and the Audi A8 also help.
Besides, I'm all for positive representations of men with high hairlines. Although I'm sure the suit and the Audi A8 also help.
White paper.
Facebook deserves many things from us. Scorn. Ridicule. Dismissive smirks. Whether or not it deserves statistical analysis, though, is something I'm not prepared to deal with yet.
That being said, earlier this morning I surpassed 10K people that I'm connected to through friends. I could post a screengrab to prove this, but I don't want to make things any worse than they already are.
That being said, earlier this morning I surpassed 10K people that I'm connected to through friends. I could post a screengrab to prove this, but I don't want to make things any worse than they already are.
10 January 2006
I am frightened by whoever photoshopped this.
But I'm more frightened at the thought that it actually isn't photoshopped. My whole 'fleeing to Europe' thing makes more sense with each passing day, it seems like.
Can you feel it?
I sure can. It's starting to feel very Olympic, not least of all because NBC finally released their broadcast schedule. Reading through it becomes crystal clear that I will have to go back to the cable company and have my TV service reconnected (sadly, the attempts to get an attenae to work were blocked by the fact that I live on the side of a hill). On the upside, though, I will only need the limited cable, and not the expanded cable, as NBC proper will be showing a good enough cross-section of the events; USA will be showing some biathlon and curling, but the bulk of the cable service is dedicated to every single hockey game of the Olympics, and that is really not worth the extra money. I haven't missed an Olympics since I realized they existed halfway during the Albertville '92 games, and I seriously wouldn't be able to live with myself if I skipped out now.
Snark.
I never knew the New York Times could be so campy and sarcastic, yet I never really expected to see them do this long of an article about the porn industry awards.
[The best feature award] went to "Pirates," a relatively high-budget story of a group of ragtag sailors who go searching for a crew of evil pirates who have a plan for world domination. Also, many of the characters in the movie have sex with one another.
..."There's nothing worse then when the pizza boy rings the doorbell, the girl says she doesn't have a tip, and then they get it on," she said. Ms. Daniels also won an award for best screenplay for a parody, "Camp Cuddly Pines Power Tool Massacre," which presumably had a storyline more in keeping with her tastes.
09 January 2006
#*&@!
There are lines that must be drawn in a civilized, law-abiding society. I believe the Bush Administration and its bastard child, the Dept. of Homeland Security, may want to look behind it and find that line again. Far, far behind.
Cause the FCC can suck it, that's why.
Howard Stern's first day at Sirius, by the numbers. (Mom, you might not want to look at this. Trust me.)
05 January 2006
04 January 2006
01 January 2006
Resolved.
1] To be able to again run 10K on the treadmill by June. (I still have plenty of homemade treats to finish off, so this is as much for pragmatism as it is for pride.)
2] To have a grad school, internship, or job for the fall lined up by June. (They have internships in Europe right? They have bars and bartenders over there, that's for damn sure.)
3] To go dancing at a club at least every other week; techno, 80s, salsa, whatever. (I've been told I have great rhythm; it's a shame to deny it to the people.)
4] To try and get a second date with a young lady whom I fancy. (Course, there's always the obstacle of getting that first date. Damn.)
5] To get and I mean the hell out of this state.
2] To have a grad school, internship, or job for the fall lined up by June. (They have internships in Europe right? They have bars and bartenders over there, that's for damn sure.)
3] To go dancing at a club at least every other week; techno, 80s, salsa, whatever. (I've been told I have great rhythm; it's a shame to deny it to the people.)
4] To try and get a second date with a young lady whom I fancy. (Course, there's always the obstacle of getting that first date. Damn.)
5] To get and I mean the hell out of this state.
Chart topper.
Yes it's an arbitrary list from a site that many people don't read, but I take much solace in knowing just how many albums from this 2005 top ten list I already had on my iTunes: #10 Bloc Party, #7 ...And You Will Know Us By the Trail of the Dead, #6 British Sea Power, #3 M83, #2 The Decemberists, and #1 Wolf Parade. Seriously people, listen to these bands as soon as possible; they're why I still have hope in music today.
31 December 2005
Detox.
Alright, after a week of eating everything that I felt like eating, topped off with ribs, cake and beer tonight with J&A, I'm going into detox starting today. If I do happen to go out for New Year's Eve, I will not be drinking; I figure it may well take me three weeks of constant diet and exercise to make up for my week-long binge, and the sooner I start, the better. I satisfied my cravings, so now, I just have to say no to the black & white brownies. I love them hard, but they don't love me.
30 December 2005
On coming back from a week of homecooking.
I currently have in my kitchen, approximately, five thousand pumpkin bars, sixteen thousand brownies, a thousand pieces of fudge, and enough chicken and noodles to fill a large tub. You know, give or take.
23 December 2005
Crackpipe.
This. Is. Hilarious. And just in time for the Holidays! Have a good weekend everybody; I'm in Humboldt until Thursday the 29th (my birthday), so do be merry and joyful and enjoy the assload of food.
22 December 2005
Layers.
So I was watching this fantastic movie today, Layer Cake, starring the new 007 Daniel Craig, and my biggest celebrity crush Sienna Miller (despite her still smoking those blasted cigarettes). Anyway, it's a very slick, very clever movie (and fits in nicely with my recent British kick), but the ending took the wind right out of my sails. I hate to give it away, but seriously, it's one of those things where you're watching and thinking 'Ah, I hope they wrap this up in good order' and then the ending comes and the only words out of your mouth are "Fuck me."
It's still an awesome film, but bloody hell.
It's still an awesome film, but bloody hell.
21 December 2005
Career.
So I've considered it before, but after reading this NY Times article about premium drinks and the bars that serve them, I think I might just forget about journalism and professional politics and such. After all, the tip on a $1,500 cocktail would help soothe the realization that I won't change the world. Besides, it's probably a great career; you have an excuse for sleeping in, plenty of downtime to read and exercise, and you get to laugh at the little yuppies and hipsters as they waste away into the night.
PS: In the recipe for the 'World Cocktail': 4 Drops of 23-carat edible liquid gold. My ass.
PS: In the recipe for the 'World Cocktail': 4 Drops of 23-carat edible liquid gold. My ass.
The long awaited slippery slope finally presents itself.
Indeed.
Think about it. Many Jews weren't keen on leaving Germany because they figured the rampant anti-Semitism would blow over, and heck, they'd survived plenty of other storms in the past by keeping a low profile. And even as the SS pushed them closer and closer to the abyss, people thought "this is it, this is the absolute bottom." It is a pretty long way from relegating a people to particular professions, to forcing them to register and wear Yellow Stars, to putting them into ghettoes, to killing them, isn't it?
So we fight erosion of civil liberties at every turn, no matter what the justification from the State might be. That is the 'eternal vigiliance' of which Jefferson spoke. The Constitution doesn't guarantee any rights. The Senate doesn't safeguard our liberties. The President doesn't protect us. Only we the People do. Once we abdicate our responsibility to be skeptical of our government, to engage in oversight, to scrutinize its every deed, we lose that liberty we're supposed to defend.
20 December 2005
18 December 2005
"You're talking shit."
Ladies and gentlemen, let me be very clear: this is the most brilliant show I've ever heard in my life. And by brilliant, I mean absolutely demented.
Game over.
On the subject of the president knowingly violating the law, this says everything I want to, and more.
16 December 2005
Well read.
I started this book at the very beginning of the semester and I swear I'm going to finish it within the next week, so that I can then finish this book. Then I'll get around to finishing a few others, like this one, and perhaps this one, and then I can get around to starting this most important book (while knowing that I need to finish this other most important book). And if I have some downtime, I might finish the post-WWII period of this book too. But that might be getting a little greedy.
"As long as I got a job, you got a job. Understand?"
RIP John Spencer, 'Leo McGarry' on the West Wing. Perhaps fate deemed that I spend the last two days watching West Wing DVDs for season two, which may have been the greatest season of any television show in history. Not five minutes ago I watched the end of perhaps the most cinematic TV episode ever, 'Two Cathedrals', and I then logged on only to find this tragic news. For those of you familiar with the episode, it ends with a fitting song while McGarry and the rest of the staff watch Bartlet put his hands in his pockets, look away, and smile at the question of whether he would run again for president. John Spencer was the backbone of that show; his acting, personality, and charisma was of a finer calibre than most others in the business and friends, that is indeed saying something.
Let me bid you farewell
Every man has to die
But it’s written in the starlight
And every line on your palm
We’re fools to make war
On our brothers in arms
–Dire Straits, 'Brothers in Arms'
Let me bid you farewell
Every man has to die
But it’s written in the starlight
And every line on your palm
We’re fools to make war
On our brothers in arms
–Dire Straits, 'Brothers in Arms'
15 December 2005
Congressin'.
Via Eschaton, this congressman gets his priorities right; too bad the rest of the House has its head lodged between the buttcheeks of Rupert Murdoch.
14 December 2005
Process.
So I've realized that applying for graduate school sucks. See, last year I didn't get to the part of the actual filling out of the application forms; I had only had recommendation forms sent in and taken the GRE by the time I decided to call it off for a year. But now I'm trying to get these two schools (NYU and SFU) taken care of before Christmas, and today I find out about another program: the Globalization Studies track in Dartmouth's MALS program. It really sounds like it would be right in my wheelhouse, as I'm all for interdisciplinary approaches to modern history, poli sci, sociology and, *cough*economics*cough*. And it's not due until 15 Feb., which gives enough time to round up yet another batch of recommendations if I choose to shoot for it. But definitely no warm-weather options this year; the deadline for USC's Politics & International Relations PhD program has already passed. Had I been up for committing myself to five more years of this stuff, I would've jumped at it.
As if I'm not gonna be immersed in politics and international relations for the next five years anyway. Dammit, at least I would've gotten paid for it *and* lived in Southern California. It might steal your soul, but maybe I'd finally get a tan.
As if I'm not gonna be immersed in politics and international relations for the next five years anyway. Dammit, at least I would've gotten paid for it *and* lived in Southern California. It might steal your soul, but maybe I'd finally get a tan.
On obsessing over my weight.
This morning at the Rec I weighed in just over 141 pounds, which was a little lighter than I was expecting considering my lack of cardio exercise lately. I'll probably work out every day until I leave for home next Friday evening, and during my week at home I'll probably go to the Rehab & Fitness Center a few times until I come back on 30 Dec. Considering my weakness for elk steak, mashed potatoes, homemade bread, cookies, and anything else my mom sees fit to cook, I'm curious as to what my weight will be when I go to the Rec again on 3 Jan., so please feel free to state your guess in the comments. Hey, blogs are for nothing if not overwrought vanity; myself, I'm gonna go with 143 pounds, if only because I'll force myself into a massive calorie deficit within the next week.
I may need help.
I may need help.
12 December 2005
Tidings of comfort and joy.
One of the things about not having TV is that you miss the little things, like this 'War on Christmas' exchange between Sam Seder and Bob Knight (no, probably not *that* Bob Knight) that Atrios managed to capture for us. How the Santa Claus/Al Queda link somehow escaped us is beyond me.
I'd very much prefer not to take these people seriously, but I have a feeling that sometime soon I'm not gonna have a choice. I knew this whole thing was out of hand when Bill O'Reilly a few weeks said that 'Every business in America should be on their knees thanking Jesus for being born and giving us the Christmas shopping season.' Because yes Bill, the non-existence of day-after-Thanksgiving sales is the only way our world would be changed in the past 2,000 years had Christ not been born. What an ignorant pusswad.
I'd very much prefer not to take these people seriously, but I have a feeling that sometime soon I'm not gonna have a choice. I knew this whole thing was out of hand when Bill O'Reilly a few weeks said that 'Every business in America should be on their knees thanking Jesus for being born and giving us the Christmas shopping season.' Because yes Bill, the non-existence of day-after-Thanksgiving sales is the only way our world would be changed in the past 2,000 years had Christ not been born. What an ignorant pusswad.
10 December 2005
Kal-El.
I was reading, for reasons passing understanding, this message board about the content of the new Superman Returns trailer, and somebody asked why there would be flashbacks to Clark Kent's youth if the movie is a 'semi-sequel' that supposes he has been gone for a few years after the first movie ends. The response was that people need to be reintroduced to the character.
Reintroduced to the character? It's freaking Superman. Hello? Truth, justice, the American way? Unnecessary cape and ridiculous briefs? We know the guy, alright. But that doesn't mean we don't like watching hijinks about learning to fly and seeing gratuitous shots of how flat Kansas is.
Reintroduced to the character? It's freaking Superman. Hello? Truth, justice, the American way? Unnecessary cape and ridiculous briefs? We know the guy, alright. But that doesn't mean we don't like watching hijinks about learning to fly and seeing gratuitous shots of how flat Kansas is.
07 December 2005
On the Morality of War and the Power of Words, or: What I want to be when I grow up.
Since I was a junior in high school I wanted to go into journalism. No, I didn’t want to just go into journalism; I wanted to be absorbed in journalism, to be a throwback to the old-school guys, to be Henry in The Paper who finally gets to yell ‘Stop the presses!’ This went through several phases of wanting to be, in order: a cityside reporter for the New York Daily News; the next Hemingway; a correspondent for the New York Times; a page designer for really any major paper; an assistant editor for Rolling Stone; the next HST; and finally a page designer for a major magazine, before I finally burnt out and dropped out of the J-School (which was a primary motivator for coming to KU in the first place).
It’s a little odd, yes, considering that most of the past decade of my life has revolved around journalism to the point that I was recruited out of Humboldt to start and being the founding editor of a community college newspaper, that I would then give up a prime slot in journalism school. But by the time I got here I just didn’t see the J-School as giving me the guidance and education that I craved; I felt that at least majoring in history or poli sci would give me the tools I needed to truly understand the world around me. The journalistic training could come on the job. Thus I decided that my only contact with journalism would be in token slots as an editorial board member for the Kansan, while I pursued what I thought would be my actual calling: a PhD in sociology, leading to a professorship and the possibility of writing books exposing and destroying the idea of American exceptionalism.
But always in the back of my mind was that twinge of envy when read a barbed, reasoned column in the Guardian, or saw a stunningly designed magazine or front page (a fix that not even two years as designer of the Jayhawker can seem to cure). I had been reading the works of Lewis Lapham, Frank Rich, and James Fallows for a few years, and appreciated the depth and breadth of their columns and essays enough to know how they achieved it: years of study combined with writing whenever and wherever they could. I realized that I had, in a pique of purity and indignation towards the state of journalism and J-Schools in our modern society, perhaps gone about this the wrong way. Reading Hendrik Hertzberg last winter confirmed it.
I bought his compendium, Politics: Observations & Arguments, 1966-2004, last August, but due to the pressures of 18 course hours (plus said yearbook duties and the hassle of a crash course in applying for grad schools) I didn’t get around to it until winter break. While I read it all in the matter of a week, it was not one of those books that hit me right away; the wit, the complexities, the vitality, and the process of reflection that Hertzberg used in his writing were all notable at first glance, but they took a while to sink in. So did the issues he wrote about.
A year later and I’m still rereading his essays, much more so than I am with any other writer (and considering the guys I mentioned above, that’s saying something). I could say that Hertzberg and Lapham and Rich have influenced me to apply to the School of Journalism at NYU, specifically its Cultural Reporting and Criticism master’s program, but more importantly it was the understanding that they crafted their style to get their positions, and then used the freedom of those positions to use that style to its greatest advantage, that pushed me towards that program. (Realizing that I’m not ready for a five-year doctoral commitment now, despite how much I love social theory, was also, admittedly, a factor.) Will it all be moot if I can’t figure out how to pay for a year and a half in NYC, attending a graduate school of journalism? I hope not, but whatever the outcome of the next few months of waiting, I’m pretty sure that this gut feeling is the right one; it’s possible that by burning out and dropping out of the J-School, I’ll end up with an even stronger love of journalism, and a better intuition for where it’ll take me.
••••
I bring all of this up by way of responding to a recent blog posting by my colleague from this summer, Vince Myers. Vince is a committed conservative, as he has made clear many times, and I have found his writings to be thoughtful and clearly rooted in his ideals. On the issue of Iraq, we have a history of clashing over U.S. policy and the future of that nation in the midst of a continued insurgency.
When I said that reading Hendrik Hertzberg’s book didn’t fully hit me at the time, one of his essays was an exception then, and continues to be today. Though written over two decades ago while Hertzberg was editor of the New Republic, his “Why the War Was Immoral” is I believe a classic in essay writing; the demolition he delivers to the twin pillars of the rationale behind the Vietnam war is as stunning in its brevity as it is in its ethical & political examination of that turbulent time.
Hertzberg finds that with Vietnam, there were those two pillars to why we were there: the geopolitical and the moral. He exposes the geopolitical ‘domino’ theory for the straw house that it was: our Cold War understanding of Communist aggression/expansion was rooted more in fear than in reality. It was combined with the notion that we should continue the war in Vietnam because to pull out would show weakness: “We said we would fight, therefore we must fight: at many a juncture along the way that logic seemed compelling. But it was not a compelling reason to fight forever. Our guarantees were not worthless. It was the war that was worthless. (35)”
Dispatching this, Hertzberg than focuses on why the war was said to be moral, because it would save South Vietnam from communism. “And to the extent that the war was fought for this aim, it was fought for a moral aim. But this says no more than that the war was fought with good intentions rather than evil ones, which is saying very little. If good intentions were enough, there would be no neoconservatives. (35)”
He finds in examining the moral case for war that for it to be sustained, “the war must be judged to have been winnable–winnable, moreover, at a lower cost in suffering and death and than the cost of a communist victory. (36)” But as he explains, there had to have been a point where victory can be reached, where the cost-benefit balance tilts our way, where the suffering can be justified, where North Vietnam would have given up. This point didn’t exist.
“If the North Vietnamese were willing to accept limitless casualties, if they were willing to pay any price, than the war could not have been won except by the physical destruction of North Vietnam and the killing of a large proportion of its people. … Of course no American wanted to kill everybody in Vietnam. Americans are not monsters. But Americans are not losers, either. Americans are winners. But the logic of winning in Vietnam was inescapably the logic of genocide. We did not lose in Vietnam. We chose not to win. (37)”
In writing this essay Hertzberg is responding to Norman Podhoretz, who wrote that victory was beyond our the moral capabilities. “Yes, it was beyond our moral capabilities–except that what he understands as a moral failure I understand as a moral success. It wasn’t cowardice that finally impelled us to quit. It was conscience. (37)”
••••
One of the things that always infuriated me about the anti-war movement was the ‘No war for oil!’ signs and slogans. The mindset that the war was all about material gain, about staffing the oil fields with Halliburton men and stacking the tax rates in favor of foreign contractors permeated the entire movement before the war started, and refuses to go away. It is a dangerous, debilitating mindset, one that has hindered the movement in ways that they don’t even understand yet. Because, you see, the war was in fact about oil.
Not in terms of seizing tankers and bringing back $1.20/gallon gasoline; that would negate the need for ANWR. No, the war was about oil in that it was about power; if the world is a chessboard, than the Middle East is the center four squares. Control it and you dictate the rest of the board; you don’t even need to occupy those squares, but simply have your knights, rooks or bishops in a position to strike with one move and reestablish dominance.
In the middle part of the century, we wanted control and friendly relations with Middle Eastern nations in order to satisfy our oil needs as we became a superpower engaged in a struggle that would eclipse all geopolitical rivalries before it. To have access to the petroleum reserves would allow our military and economy to function at full-out expansion; anything less was unacceptable. And thus we chained ourselves to sultans and monarchs who governed with an iron fist, just as we allied ourselves with murderers and despots in Vietnam and Latin America to curb ‘aggression’.
Now, however, it’s not our oil needs that satisfied, but the rest of the world. The Middle East accounts for a fraction of our total oil inflows; the lion’s share of our petroleum comes from this hemisphere, with Canada as our biggest supplier, followed by Mexico and Venezuela (Hugo Chavez will be a topic for another day). But, the rest of the industrialized world isn’t as diversified as we are (or perhaps simply doesn’t have the kind of sway that have historically claimed within this half of the world). The European Union and Japan have been much more dependent on Middle Eastern oil for the past few decades; the East Asian tigers revitalized that part of the world and in a hurry during the 1990s, and caused massive economic and social changes to their nations. Now the elephants are stirring; India and China are ever increasing their economic output, which means industrialization, which means new money, which means cars. Lots of them. And no emissions standards to hold them back either.
By holding onto the center of the chessboard, the U.S. is desperately clinging to its power over the developed and developing world. Keeping military units in stationed in the Middle East allowed the U.S. to effectively say to those industrialized countries “You want to step in and take care of this? No? Okay then.” When we invaded Iraq, it was a further step to reassert our control; by grasping to a geopolitical (stopping the spectre of Islamic fundamentalist theocracy) and a moral (spreading democracy) framework, we bet the house on the prospect that the rest of the world would respond and work with an America that has only the best interests of the world at heart. It is clearer now, more than ever, that we have lost that bet.
Thus my frustration at the protestors I mentioned above; they are looking at the world through glasses that do not fit anymore, and thus they fail to address the greater injustices of a global culture that allows for despots and democracies to operate unhindered in the guise of neoliberalism. I do not subscribe to the theory that we are in the midst of an American Empire; I believe we had our empire, and are now on the tail-end. Our economy is showing signs of strain that were not thought possible in the late 1990s; every day trucks full of U.S. hard currency roll into the Chinese central bank to finance our debt. Brazil will surpass us in agricultural output by the end of the decade; we are losing our industrial capacity in the name of unfettered global capital; we are eroding our scientific and technological edge in the name of intelligent design. Our moral credibility decreases with each new mention of black sites in Europe and elsewhere; we have failed to heed the lessons of Abu Ghraib and GuantƔnamo, and in so doing consigned ourselves to a shame that could have been avoided had we heeded the lessons of the Trail of Tears. Our military is tied down in Iraq to the point that we may be witnessing in front of our very eyes the destruction of the modern volunteer army, and certainly the national guard system; if needed to operate in a theater of war in the near future, there is much reason to fear the responsiveness of units and troops called upon to fight a war by people whom I swear to God seem to have never read a history book.
There is reason to debate policy in Iraq. There is reason to believe that our policies are not working, just as there is reason to believe that perhaps we can pull it out. But any and every discussion must start with a frank and solid grounding of our aims and our capabilities to fight and ultimately win in Iraq. Is there a point at which we can claim victory in Iraq? This presumes that the insurgency will eventually draw down and fail; this presumption, in history, has been the cause of too much suffering and destruction to keep rolling the dice. How much is enough? A half a trillion dollars and 3,000 U.S. soliders? A trillion dollars and 5,000 soliders?
Too often we look at the cost-benefits and try to find that magic equation that will solve everything, but terror and democracy and nationalism can’t be plugged in like regular integers. They are factors that govern the actions of men more so than armor plating or dollar bills, and thus they are beyond our capabilities to control or fight. The North Vietnamese were prepared to sustain losses we couldn’t even imagine in order to drive out what they perceived as an occupying army; in throwing numbers at the variables, we failed to see the absurdity of the equation. At the time we could explain and justify it, but how can we do so now?
It’s a little odd, yes, considering that most of the past decade of my life has revolved around journalism to the point that I was recruited out of Humboldt to start and being the founding editor of a community college newspaper, that I would then give up a prime slot in journalism school. But by the time I got here I just didn’t see the J-School as giving me the guidance and education that I craved; I felt that at least majoring in history or poli sci would give me the tools I needed to truly understand the world around me. The journalistic training could come on the job. Thus I decided that my only contact with journalism would be in token slots as an editorial board member for the Kansan, while I pursued what I thought would be my actual calling: a PhD in sociology, leading to a professorship and the possibility of writing books exposing and destroying the idea of American exceptionalism.
But always in the back of my mind was that twinge of envy when read a barbed, reasoned column in the Guardian, or saw a stunningly designed magazine or front page (a fix that not even two years as designer of the Jayhawker can seem to cure). I had been reading the works of Lewis Lapham, Frank Rich, and James Fallows for a few years, and appreciated the depth and breadth of their columns and essays enough to know how they achieved it: years of study combined with writing whenever and wherever they could. I realized that I had, in a pique of purity and indignation towards the state of journalism and J-Schools in our modern society, perhaps gone about this the wrong way. Reading Hendrik Hertzberg last winter confirmed it.
I bought his compendium, Politics: Observations & Arguments, 1966-2004, last August, but due to the pressures of 18 course hours (plus said yearbook duties and the hassle of a crash course in applying for grad schools) I didn’t get around to it until winter break. While I read it all in the matter of a week, it was not one of those books that hit me right away; the wit, the complexities, the vitality, and the process of reflection that Hertzberg used in his writing were all notable at first glance, but they took a while to sink in. So did the issues he wrote about.
A year later and I’m still rereading his essays, much more so than I am with any other writer (and considering the guys I mentioned above, that’s saying something). I could say that Hertzberg and Lapham and Rich have influenced me to apply to the School of Journalism at NYU, specifically its Cultural Reporting and Criticism master’s program, but more importantly it was the understanding that they crafted their style to get their positions, and then used the freedom of those positions to use that style to its greatest advantage, that pushed me towards that program. (Realizing that I’m not ready for a five-year doctoral commitment now, despite how much I love social theory, was also, admittedly, a factor.) Will it all be moot if I can’t figure out how to pay for a year and a half in NYC, attending a graduate school of journalism? I hope not, but whatever the outcome of the next few months of waiting, I’m pretty sure that this gut feeling is the right one; it’s possible that by burning out and dropping out of the J-School, I’ll end up with an even stronger love of journalism, and a better intuition for where it’ll take me.
••••
I bring all of this up by way of responding to a recent blog posting by my colleague from this summer, Vince Myers. Vince is a committed conservative, as he has made clear many times, and I have found his writings to be thoughtful and clearly rooted in his ideals. On the issue of Iraq, we have a history of clashing over U.S. policy and the future of that nation in the midst of a continued insurgency.
When I said that reading Hendrik Hertzberg’s book didn’t fully hit me at the time, one of his essays was an exception then, and continues to be today. Though written over two decades ago while Hertzberg was editor of the New Republic, his “Why the War Was Immoral” is I believe a classic in essay writing; the demolition he delivers to the twin pillars of the rationale behind the Vietnam war is as stunning in its brevity as it is in its ethical & political examination of that turbulent time.
Hertzberg finds that with Vietnam, there were those two pillars to why we were there: the geopolitical and the moral. He exposes the geopolitical ‘domino’ theory for the straw house that it was: our Cold War understanding of Communist aggression/expansion was rooted more in fear than in reality. It was combined with the notion that we should continue the war in Vietnam because to pull out would show weakness: “We said we would fight, therefore we must fight: at many a juncture along the way that logic seemed compelling. But it was not a compelling reason to fight forever. Our guarantees were not worthless. It was the war that was worthless. (35)”
Dispatching this, Hertzberg than focuses on why the war was said to be moral, because it would save South Vietnam from communism. “And to the extent that the war was fought for this aim, it was fought for a moral aim. But this says no more than that the war was fought with good intentions rather than evil ones, which is saying very little. If good intentions were enough, there would be no neoconservatives. (35)”
He finds in examining the moral case for war that for it to be sustained, “the war must be judged to have been winnable–winnable, moreover, at a lower cost in suffering and death and than the cost of a communist victory. (36)” But as he explains, there had to have been a point where victory can be reached, where the cost-benefit balance tilts our way, where the suffering can be justified, where North Vietnam would have given up. This point didn’t exist.
“If the North Vietnamese were willing to accept limitless casualties, if they were willing to pay any price, than the war could not have been won except by the physical destruction of North Vietnam and the killing of a large proportion of its people. … Of course no American wanted to kill everybody in Vietnam. Americans are not monsters. But Americans are not losers, either. Americans are winners. But the logic of winning in Vietnam was inescapably the logic of genocide. We did not lose in Vietnam. We chose not to win. (37)”
In writing this essay Hertzberg is responding to Norman Podhoretz, who wrote that victory was beyond our the moral capabilities. “Yes, it was beyond our moral capabilities–except that what he understands as a moral failure I understand as a moral success. It wasn’t cowardice that finally impelled us to quit. It was conscience. (37)”
••••
One of the things that always infuriated me about the anti-war movement was the ‘No war for oil!’ signs and slogans. The mindset that the war was all about material gain, about staffing the oil fields with Halliburton men and stacking the tax rates in favor of foreign contractors permeated the entire movement before the war started, and refuses to go away. It is a dangerous, debilitating mindset, one that has hindered the movement in ways that they don’t even understand yet. Because, you see, the war was in fact about oil.
Not in terms of seizing tankers and bringing back $1.20/gallon gasoline; that would negate the need for ANWR. No, the war was about oil in that it was about power; if the world is a chessboard, than the Middle East is the center four squares. Control it and you dictate the rest of the board; you don’t even need to occupy those squares, but simply have your knights, rooks or bishops in a position to strike with one move and reestablish dominance.
In the middle part of the century, we wanted control and friendly relations with Middle Eastern nations in order to satisfy our oil needs as we became a superpower engaged in a struggle that would eclipse all geopolitical rivalries before it. To have access to the petroleum reserves would allow our military and economy to function at full-out expansion; anything less was unacceptable. And thus we chained ourselves to sultans and monarchs who governed with an iron fist, just as we allied ourselves with murderers and despots in Vietnam and Latin America to curb ‘aggression’.
Now, however, it’s not our oil needs that satisfied, but the rest of the world. The Middle East accounts for a fraction of our total oil inflows; the lion’s share of our petroleum comes from this hemisphere, with Canada as our biggest supplier, followed by Mexico and Venezuela (Hugo Chavez will be a topic for another day). But, the rest of the industrialized world isn’t as diversified as we are (or perhaps simply doesn’t have the kind of sway that have historically claimed within this half of the world). The European Union and Japan have been much more dependent on Middle Eastern oil for the past few decades; the East Asian tigers revitalized that part of the world and in a hurry during the 1990s, and caused massive economic and social changes to their nations. Now the elephants are stirring; India and China are ever increasing their economic output, which means industrialization, which means new money, which means cars. Lots of them. And no emissions standards to hold them back either.
By holding onto the center of the chessboard, the U.S. is desperately clinging to its power over the developed and developing world. Keeping military units in stationed in the Middle East allowed the U.S. to effectively say to those industrialized countries “You want to step in and take care of this? No? Okay then.” When we invaded Iraq, it was a further step to reassert our control; by grasping to a geopolitical (stopping the spectre of Islamic fundamentalist theocracy) and a moral (spreading democracy) framework, we bet the house on the prospect that the rest of the world would respond and work with an America that has only the best interests of the world at heart. It is clearer now, more than ever, that we have lost that bet.
Thus my frustration at the protestors I mentioned above; they are looking at the world through glasses that do not fit anymore, and thus they fail to address the greater injustices of a global culture that allows for despots and democracies to operate unhindered in the guise of neoliberalism. I do not subscribe to the theory that we are in the midst of an American Empire; I believe we had our empire, and are now on the tail-end. Our economy is showing signs of strain that were not thought possible in the late 1990s; every day trucks full of U.S. hard currency roll into the Chinese central bank to finance our debt. Brazil will surpass us in agricultural output by the end of the decade; we are losing our industrial capacity in the name of unfettered global capital; we are eroding our scientific and technological edge in the name of intelligent design. Our moral credibility decreases with each new mention of black sites in Europe and elsewhere; we have failed to heed the lessons of Abu Ghraib and GuantƔnamo, and in so doing consigned ourselves to a shame that could have been avoided had we heeded the lessons of the Trail of Tears. Our military is tied down in Iraq to the point that we may be witnessing in front of our very eyes the destruction of the modern volunteer army, and certainly the national guard system; if needed to operate in a theater of war in the near future, there is much reason to fear the responsiveness of units and troops called upon to fight a war by people whom I swear to God seem to have never read a history book.
There is reason to debate policy in Iraq. There is reason to believe that our policies are not working, just as there is reason to believe that perhaps we can pull it out. But any and every discussion must start with a frank and solid grounding of our aims and our capabilities to fight and ultimately win in Iraq. Is there a point at which we can claim victory in Iraq? This presumes that the insurgency will eventually draw down and fail; this presumption, in history, has been the cause of too much suffering and destruction to keep rolling the dice. How much is enough? A half a trillion dollars and 3,000 U.S. soliders? A trillion dollars and 5,000 soliders?
Too often we look at the cost-benefits and try to find that magic equation that will solve everything, but terror and democracy and nationalism can’t be plugged in like regular integers. They are factors that govern the actions of men more so than armor plating or dollar bills, and thus they are beyond our capabilities to control or fight. The North Vietnamese were prepared to sustain losses we couldn’t even imagine in order to drive out what they perceived as an occupying army; in throwing numbers at the variables, we failed to see the absurdity of the equation. At the time we could explain and justify it, but how can we do so now?
05 December 2005
Seriously people, what the hell?
I haven't posted anything about the whole Paul Mirecki situation, hoping beyond hope that cooler and brighter minds would eventually prevail. I was wrong.
GRE, One Year On: Is it possible that I'm dumber now?
Last December:
Verbal: 630
Quantitative: 610
Analytic: 5.0
Today:
Verbal: 580
Quantitative: 670
Analytic: ???
Damn adaptive mode testing; the first five or six questions basically determine how high a score you'll get, and with the verbal it's all so random with regards to what vocabulary you're gonna get thrown at you. At least universities in Canada don't require the GRE. Score!
Verbal: 630
Quantitative: 610
Analytic: 5.0
Today:
Verbal: 580
Quantitative: 670
Analytic: ???
Damn adaptive mode testing; the first five or six questions basically determine how high a score you'll get, and with the verbal it's all so random with regards to what vocabulary you're gonna get thrown at you. At least universities in Canada don't require the GRE. Score!
04 December 2005
Dammit, Pt. 2

I can't believe I forgot to celebrate my one year anniversary on Facebook. I mean, I celebrated Annie's birthday (and my last overnight shift at Oliver) last night with a CoB at Tim's ghettoplex, but this totally slipped my mind. When I think about the amount of time I have spent on Facebook over the last year...wait, no I don't want to think about it, because I might start weeping.
30 November 2005
Holes.

Freaking Italians and their fashion ideas.
Actually, it's pretty cool; the Winter Olympic medals since 1992 have been very creative and aesthetically pleasing, and these are no exception. The ribbon is particularly inspired. My faves have always been the Lillehammer medals with the disc of granite, though the execution of the Salt Lake medals was very well done (they were also hyooge).
Holy #@*$!
If you're registered with the NY Times, then you must absolutely watch the video clip connected with this article about Reggie Bush, the standout running back at USC (which was always my hopeful alma mater; no offense to KU) who is also the presumptive Heisman winner. The seven and half minutes of video is from his high school days, and it is some of the sickest football footage I have ever seen. The number of plays in which the man is able to elude an entire defense is mindblowing; it's literally like watching a Bruce Lee movie, where he just takes guys one at a time. And stay for the end of the video; the punt return at the end will make you laugh yourself silly.
28 November 2005
Eh?
It's days like these that start to make me wonder: And I want to move to Canada?
Course, Vancouver surely isn't that bad. And I very well could have been the only person in this country Thursday morning watching Parliamentary debate on the vote of no confidence on CSPAN. It was exciting television though; they allow heckling and applause, there are four parties represented, and most of all, every once in a while somebody starts talking in French without setting a car on fire.
Course, Vancouver surely isn't that bad. And I very well could have been the only person in this country Thursday morning watching Parliamentary debate on the vote of no confidence on CSPAN. It was exciting television though; they allow heckling and applause, there are four parties represented, and most of all, every once in a while somebody starts talking in French without setting a car on fire.
27 November 2005
Travesty.
Take a look at this bowl schedule. Nevermind the sheer number of bowl games, or the product tie-ins and sponsorships, and cast your eyes towards the bottom of the schedule. Anything pop out at you? Look out of place?
THERE ARE NO GAMES ON NEW YEAR'S DAY!!!!
Yes I know that New Year's falls on a Sunday, but that's never stopped things before; I distinctly remember the Rose Bowl being played on a Sunday while the Tournament of Roses parade was held on Monday a few years back. For the life of me I cannot understand what is happening here; it was bad enough when they decided to make the national championship game on 2 Jan. instead of the First of the year, just to bump up the ratings. Then it was 3 Jan., then 4 Jan., then last year the Humanitarian Bowl was played after the BCS title game.
The best idea I ever heard for college football was to make the regular season end on the first Sat. in December with the conference title games and Army-Navy. The next weekend you start an eight-team tournament at the sites of the higher-seeded schools, with the losers in those games slotted into the Sugar and Fiesta Bowls while the winners went to neutral NFL sites (such as Giants Stadium or Arrowhead) for the national semifinals the next weekend. (And while we're on the subject, is there not a cooler term in all of sports than 'national semifinal'? I consider it one of the reasons why the NCAA basketball tournament is so very special, but I digress.) The two teams that lose in the semis would then play in the Orange Bowl, while the national championship would be in the Rose Bowl, every year, starting at 4pm PST on New Year's Day.
Would it be perfect? Hell no. But in the California sunshine, after that glorious parade, who the hell would care?
THERE ARE NO GAMES ON NEW YEAR'S DAY!!!!
Yes I know that New Year's falls on a Sunday, but that's never stopped things before; I distinctly remember the Rose Bowl being played on a Sunday while the Tournament of Roses parade was held on Monday a few years back. For the life of me I cannot understand what is happening here; it was bad enough when they decided to make the national championship game on 2 Jan. instead of the First of the year, just to bump up the ratings. Then it was 3 Jan., then 4 Jan., then last year the Humanitarian Bowl was played after the BCS title game.
The best idea I ever heard for college football was to make the regular season end on the first Sat. in December with the conference title games and Army-Navy. The next weekend you start an eight-team tournament at the sites of the higher-seeded schools, with the losers in those games slotted into the Sugar and Fiesta Bowls while the winners went to neutral NFL sites (such as Giants Stadium or Arrowhead) for the national semifinals the next weekend. (And while we're on the subject, is there not a cooler term in all of sports than 'national semifinal'? I consider it one of the reasons why the NCAA basketball tournament is so very special, but I digress.) The two teams that lose in the semis would then play in the Orange Bowl, while the national championship would be in the Rose Bowl, every year, starting at 4pm PST on New Year's Day.
Would it be perfect? Hell no. But in the California sunshine, after that glorious parade, who the hell would care?
26 November 2005
21 November 2005
The beast within.
Via Atrios, a frank look at ourselves and our seeming ease with torture.
When the smoke finally clears, and we can see past that dramatic day on 9/11 and put the threat of islamic fundamentalism into its proper perspective, I wonder if we'll be able to go back to our old ethical framework? I'm not so sure we will even want to. It's not that it changed us so much as it revealed us, I think. A society that can so easily discard it's legal and ethical taboos against cruelty and barbarism, is an unstable society to begin with.
17 November 2005
16 November 2005
Plastic.
The people who make the baggies that the cereal comes in inside the box need to get their fucking act together. That is all I have to say about that.
13 November 2005
12 November 2005
True colors.
I've never trusted Bill O'Reilly. I couldn't stand him or his show, his books or his falafels, but up until now I thought him as really nothing more than an annoyance. Now, courtesy of this transcript at ThinkProgress.org, we see just how O'Reilly feels about his fellow countrymen.
There are too many disturbing comments in here to truly do justice to, but it is the overall tone that is most illuminating, the tone of righteous indignation that some people would dare to challenge the notion that we are in the midst of "World War III." This is a man who best exemplifies the words of the movie The American President: he claims to love America, but clearly can't stand Americans.
There are too many disturbing comments in here to truly do justice to, but it is the overall tone that is most illuminating, the tone of righteous indignation that some people would dare to challenge the notion that we are in the midst of "World War III." This is a man who best exemplifies the words of the movie The American President: he claims to love America, but clearly can't stand Americans.
11 November 2005
09 November 2005
Quantified.
From Keith! Damn these things are addictive.
| This Is My Life, Rated | |
| Life: | |
| Mind: | |
| Body: | |
| Spirit: | |
| Friends/Family: | |
| Love: | |
| Finance: | |
| Take the Rate My Life Quiz | |
08 November 2005
Antidisestablishmentarianism Industries.
The title of the movie is Copy Goes Here, in case you didn't catch it from this page. These people are wondrously clever, and if you don't check their regular site every day, it's past time that you did.
The new-ness of it all.
If you're wondering whether or not you're at the wrong blog, well, you might be right. I changed not only the look but also the title and subtitle; Hemingway is gone (but not forgotten), and I put in his place a quotable of my own. Blogger didn't have many to choose from, but I'm very quickly warming up to this; the only downside was the loss of some of my customizations on the sidebar, but that's okay. It's good to be reborn every once in a while.
In other news, chicken and noodles, with a hefty slice of homemade bread to sop up the juice, is incredibly fucking good. Also, bear shits in woods.
In other news, chicken and noodles, with a hefty slice of homemade bread to sop up the juice, is incredibly fucking good. Also, bear shits in woods.
What does this picture say to you?
I love the Veer website; it's cute, it's dynamic, and goshdarnit they make some cool t-shirts. They also have this cool little survey up. I happen to be Smack in the Middle of Popular and Independent Thought. Which I guess explains my infatuation with both Rainer Maria and Kelly Clarkson.
That's it.
Being as this marks the second time that this has happened now in the span of about six years, I think we can now conclude that Kansas just said that it no longer wants its students to even think about going to the likes of a Berkeley, Michigan or NYU, let alone a Stanford, Harvard or Princeton. Furthermore, there are billions of dollars to be made in medical and biotechnological research in the future, and this state will get none of it. Way to think this one through guys!
Where's the instant replay when you want it?
"And if NFL cheerleaders can get summarily fired for drunken lesbian bathroom sex, well, that's not the America I grew up in." - A blog comment on washingtonmonthly.com.
I imagine these girls will be getting a call from Miller Lite soon.
I imagine these girls will be getting a call from Miller Lite soon.
07 November 2005
Vengeance is mine.
Keith! has a poll going on. (scroll down a bit) Those who have voted against me shall die a quick, silent death at my quick, silent hands. Not to in any way intimidate those who haven't voted yet, of course.
05 November 2005
Precious.
You brought a joy to our lives that cannot be equalled, and will not be forgotten. We love you and miss you dearly. Rest in peace.
Shoot me.
I am now in my 25th straight hour of being awake. I am also a little sore from working out especially hard this morning in order to induce fatigue, thus facilitating sleep (in theory). And the Nebraska drumline is literally in the parking lot across the street. In the words of my good friend Strong Bad: "I thought I knew what ridiculous was, until this day."
The perfect conversation.
At Oliver, this morning around 1:45am:
Ryan: I want to become a ninja.
Kyra: *seriously, quietly* You could totally do that.
Ryan: *just as serious* Yeah.
Ryan: I want to become a ninja.
Kyra: *seriously, quietly* You could totally do that.
Ryan: *just as serious* Yeah.
02 November 2005
What's next, books?
I was informed this afternoon that the KU libraries are cutting back on their newspaper subscriptions. Not the New York Times or the Lawrence Journal-World, but the newspapers that one usually can't find at their local Borders, such as the Mail & Guardian from South Africa, or the Indian Times, or other assorted publications that are essential not just for researching those areas, but also for helping international students keep in touch with home. I was told instead to look online for the M&G when I asked about what we're supposed to do for those foreign newspapers. God I'm sick of this university.
01 November 2005
Political ninja strikes back.
And to continue the point from yesterday, Harry Reid gives 'em hell. Me wonders if Bill Frist even knew about Rule 21.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(301)
-
▼
September
(43)
- Futures, pt. 2.
- Trifecta, pt. 2.
- Gymnastics come in male?
- Trifecta.
- Rip off.
- And Arnold's Drive-In Was Pleased.
- Jericho.
- Gotta save up for the podcast.
- Fix.
- Studio 60.
- What the hell else bad can happen?
- Ticket.
- Football Night in America.
- On being stranded in Santa Fe.
- Milk bottle.
- Rob!
- They won't tear us apart, pt. 3.
- Recollections.
- They won't tear us apart, pt. 2.
- Dressing up.
- The Hard Way.
- Work.
- They won't tear us apart.
- Santa Fe, pt. 2.
- Tucumcari, NM.
- Amarillo, TX.
- Shamrock, TX.
- El Reno, OK.
- Tulsa, OK.
- Oklahoma City, OK.
- Coffeyville, KS.
- Goodbye, pt. 3. (No. 500)
- They...talk....this.....slowly....pt.2.
- They...talk....this.....slowly....
- TV.
- Steve Irwin, 1962-2006.
- Futures.
- The Most Wonderful Time of the Year.
- First entry in the 'I Shit You Not' category.
- Sticks, Statham, and stereotypes.
- That's it, pt. 2.
- Meta-something.
- That's it.
-
▼
September
(43)


