I consciously avoided posting anything on the Pope, but I like this because it focuses on what I like to think he would've wanted us to see: the pageantry of both the individual and the masses. There are times when I don't want facts or palace intrigue, when I just want a story to move me and do it in a way that isn't condescending or insulting. I think this article strikes the right tone of capturing the beauty and frailty of what happened in Rome last week without going into missives about faith or politics or what the hell ever.
For what it's worth, I've seemed to gain more respect in the last week for the Pope and his mission: imagine having the kind of faith that requires you to dedicate a lifetime to tending to one billion people, in the name of God. Yes lots of horrible things have been done in the name of God, and passion & fervor in pursuit of an ideal is not always responsible. But to carry on one's shoulders the weight of an institution that stretches back to the Roman Empire, that has done more to shape the world that any other organisation or state? Dislike the Church, dispute the religion, cast doubt upon the faith, but for two decades the man both stood before the world he knew and knelt before the God he trusted.
Could he have stepped down years ago as his health deteriorated? Of course. But that's just not how it's done. In the age of Terri Schiavo and grotesque conservatism of the bumper sticker 'culture of life' variety, I think the faith of a man who both endures in the face of pain and debilitation before succumbing softly into the night because of the faith of his predecessors is heartening. Of course that is not cause to celebrate him, just as the pornographic violence of the Passion of the Christ shouldn't be reason enough to devote one's life to Jesus, but it is significant I think of the Pope's true awareness of just what he serves and who he is serving. And in the end, perhaps all that matters is that he knew.
And never will.
05 April 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(223)
-
▼
April
(56)
- I did give in on the 'plutonium breeder reactors' ...
- Exile.
- X.
- The day is almost at hand.
- Paging Seinfeld.
- "Okay, okay, I'm going to freak right out."
- Hiya.
- Brilliant, yet tragic.
- Ryan's Second Volume.
- This is all just prelude to something.
- Techno-licious.
- For the umteenth post today.
- Everything is better in Europe.
- Think of the children.
- On the joy of listening to KJHK at 2:30am on a Sun...
- Is it short for something?
- Alarm.
- Hell is being single and not knowing why.
- Decisions.
- Restricted.
- Skintight.
- Yes, I've resorted to this.
- Where he reviews a movie when he should be reading...
- Now I know why I wanted to join NASA.
- Pleasant is the new inspired.
- Things I Love, #54.
- Rundown.
- World records.
- Observations on watching CNN while hoping beyond h...
- On being assaulted by hand-flyers: Spring and Stud...
- The ignorant, non-news-reading public can blow me.
- Part of the game.
- On getting up at 6am to work out at the Rec like I...
- Inertia.
- On making a fool of myself for no particular reason.
- I find myself more and more in favor of Propositio...
- This is gonna take a while.
- Things I Love, #83.
- On not writing the paper or reading the books that...
- Shellshock.
- Santos/McGarry?!
- Throw away your television.
- "Everyone waits."
- Greatest course schedule ever.
- God the details...
- On whether Burger King is worth not standing in a ...
- Transparency.
- Lost in translation.
- Tell me they don't sound familiar.
- On the joy of softball on the Hill, followed by a ...
- Initial reactions to each of my four Korean histor...
- I'm usually not one for quizzes..
- Those Google guys know how to joke around.
- Like I could fill one gigabyte before.
- Fall into place.
- Impressive offense.
-
▼
April
(56)
No comments:
Post a Comment